Samuel Crowell's magnum opus, The Gas Chamber of Sherlock Holmes is now in print
Read a recent interview with Mr. Crowell here
***
Showing posts with label revisionism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label revisionism. Show all posts
Monday, April 18, 2011
Monday, December 6, 2010
Out of print since 1995!
Announcing a new edition of Michael Hoffman's classic work:
THE GREAT HOLOCAUST TRIAL
The Landmark Battle for the Right to Doubt the West’s Most Sacred Relic
With new material added
A great educational tool!
The record of the persecution of German-Canadian heretic Ernst Zundel by a de facto Sanhedrin, for publishing the book, Did Six Million Really Die? is almost too fantastic to countenance. Zundel faced two years in prison if convicted. His defense was initially regarded by the press and public as preposterous. "How can anyone deny the Holocaust?" was the incredulous response to the news that Zundel would vigorously defend himself and the free speech rights of all Canadians. The trial was expected to be a quick and ignominious rout of Zundel and his supporters. But in a startling reversal, the "survivors" who had appeared in court in order to send him to jail, had to submit their "testimony" to scrutiny, the rules of evidence and cross-examination, something that had never happened before and has never happened since.
Canadians grew ever more surprised and shocked at the amazing admissions which the defense team elicited from the supposed "eyewitnesses" to the homicidal gas chambers. As a result, television reporters and print journalists who covered the trial for more than eight weeks in 1985 produced broadcasts and news reports that turned Canada upside down.
The Great Holocaust Trial is the only revisionist account of Ernst Zundel's first trial, one of the few times in history when so-called "Holocaust survivors" were subjected to cross-examination by a counsel for the defense as astute, fearless and well-informed as Douglas Christie.
The first trial also pitted Dr. Raul Hilberg, who provided "expert historical" testimony intended to send Zundel to prison, against the learned Dr. Robert Faurisson, adviser to defense attorney Christie. It is not an exaggeration to say that, guided by Faurisson's knowledge and the researchers from around the world who aided this French scholar, Mr. Christie's cross-examination demolished the credibility of an academic who, at the time, was considered the world's leading authority on "The Holocaust" and the chemical "killing chambers" of Auschwitz-Birkenau.
In 1995 Hoffman expanded the book to include an account of the second trial of 1988, when Ernst Zundel produced the Leutcher Report, an unprecedented, on-site forensic examination of Auschwitz by "Mr. Death" - Fred Leutcher - the U.S. prison system's own capital punishment engineer.
In addition to Hoffman's new introductory essay, "There Should be no Talmudic Hierarchy of Victimhood," this 2010 edition contains an aftermath chronology which updates the reader on major occurrences in revisonism since 1995, including Mr. Zundel's lengthy imprisonment in Canada and Germany. It also includes two appendices: the first by Fred A. Leutcher Jr.; the second concerning a documentary film about Mr. Leutcher made by Errol Morris.
For several years revisionist colleagues have urged us to bring this important history back into print, and thanks to donations from dedicated truth-seekers, we are gratified to have accomplished this objective, twenty-five years after the first trial, as testimony to a flame that will not die, even in the darkest penal hole.
TABLE OF CONTENTS: Hoffman's Preface to the Twenty-Fifth Anniversary (Fourth) Edition: "There Should be no Talmudic Hierarchy of Victimhood"; Preface to the Third Edition; The Great Holocaust Trial (1985): Genesis; Inquisition; The Image; The Relentless Crusade. The Second Great Holocaust Trial (1988): The Context. Aftermath 1995-2010. Appendix I: The Ordeal of Fred Leutcher. Appendix II: Two Views of the film, "Mr. Death"; Bibliography and reference resources
ORDERING INFORMATION
The Great Holocaust Trial:
The Landmark Battle for the Right to Doubt the West's Most Sacred Relic
Illustrated with rare photos and newspaper clippings.
Large size, 7 x 10 quality paperback. 182 pages.
This book is not available through our online store. You can purchase it by mail with a US Check, US Money Order, International Postal Money Order or VISA or Mastercard (include your name, the account number, expiration date and the last three numbers on the back of the card), or from Amazon.com.
Please note: prices are different for each region
U.S. CUSTOMERS send $19.95 plus $3.50 shipping for the first book and $1.00 shipping for each additional copy. Wholesale: 3 copies for $55 postpaid in the U.S. Ten copies for $165 postpaid in the U.S. (the Wholesale price is not available outside the U.S.) Idaho residents add 6% tax.
CANADIANS send $19.95 plus $8.00 shipping for the first book and $4.00 shipping for each additional copy. (We cannot be held responsible for seizures of the book by Canadian Customs).
OVERSEAS customers send $19.95 plus $11.00 shipping for the first book and $6.00 shipping each additional copy.
Order from: Independent History and Research, Box 849, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho 83816 USA
The Great Holocaust Trial is also offered for sale by Amazon.com.
Please help to advertise this classic book, which has inspired thousands of people to begin to question the homicidal Auschwitz gas chamber hoax of the 20th century. Help us keep it permanently in print and amply advertised. This is one of the most effective, accessible and popular books for converting true believers into doubters!
***
Thursday, January 21, 2010
The US government in the person of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is pressuring China to end Internet censorship. This is inspired by China's alleged repression against "freedom-loving" Google.
Be aware that the US Department of State has partnered with the Israeli government and various thought police NGOs to "monitor" exposure of the truth about Judaism and Zionism online. Both the Israeli government and elite Zionists around the world advocate Internet censorship of World War II revisionism ("Holocaust denial"). Elie Wiesel recently urged the government of Hungary to improve its image by jailing revisionist historians. Germany, the close ally of the US and the Israelis, jails revisionists and censors the Internet. The US is complicit in the German repression. Obama has met with German jailer Angela Merkel and praised her "democratic values."
Google acts as the enforcement arm of the religion of Holocaustianity, protecting it from scrutiny, skepticism and exposure. We are reproducing here correspondence from Google related to Google Inc.'s 2006 censorship of two of our revisionist videos from the Internet. What does Mrs. Clinton have to say about Google's censorship?
Google has been notified that your videos violate our Program Policies
The titles of the videos are listed at the end of this message.
According to our policy, we are removing the following videos:
World War Two Revisionist Charles Provan
Deborah Lipstadt, "Amalek" and David Irving
To review our Program Policies please visit:
http://video.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=27737&topic=1490
If you believe this removal was done in error, please respond to this
email. (End quote)
Feb. 22, 2006
***
The Google corporation defines "Holocaust" revisionism as "hate speech," and on that basis withdrew the Lipstadt and Provan videos from broadcast. The censored Lipstadt video demonstrated how "Holocaust" High Priestess Lipstadt had labeled historian David Irving "Amalek," which is incitement that could possibly lead to his death. The censored Charles Provan video consisted of an interview with a researcher who believes in the gas chambers and differs with mainstream historians only on certain details. Hence, even belief in the gas chambers, when it is not total belief, in every single detail of the "Holocaust" story, now constitutes "hate speech." If this is not totalitarianism, what is? Google initially approved these two videos and broadcast them for approximately one month. The videos were removed only due to outside pressure.
Deborah Lipstadt has publicly labeled my "Amalek" video about her, "revolting."
In 2006 in the Washington Post, William Bennett and Alan Dershowitz chastised the American media for having failed to publish the cartoons against Muhammad which first appeared in Denmark: "...radical Islamists have won a war of intimidation. They have cowed the major news media from showing these cartoons. The mainstream press has capitulated to the Islamists..."
Radical Judaics are also winning a war of intimidation. They have cowed Google into censoring a video critical of Deborah Lipstadt, and another video which maintains that the execution gas chambers existed, but that they were operated mainly by Judaics. Are "intimidation" and "capitulation" only wrong when they emanate from Islamic coercion? What about Judaic intimidation of the media? It must be at a higher level of power and control, because unlike the Islamic version, Judaic intimidation is not publicized in the US media. It is perpetrated largely without the knowledge of the public.
FROM: GOOGLE VIDEO SUPPORT
To: Michael A. Hoffman II
Date: Wed Feb 22, 2006 08:00:17 PM PST
Subject: Re: [#47515979] Re: Google Video Policy Violation
Hi Mike,
Thank you for your email. We received complaints that your content violates our posted policy against hate speech.
Because the videos appear to promote Holocaust Revisionism, in violation of our policy against hate speech, we have removed the videos.
We appreciate your understanding.
Sincerely, The Google Video Team (end quote)
Be aware that the US Department of State has partnered with the Israeli government and various thought police NGOs to "monitor" exposure of the truth about Judaism and Zionism online. Both the Israeli government and elite Zionists around the world advocate Internet censorship of World War II revisionism ("Holocaust denial"). Elie Wiesel recently urged the government of Hungary to improve its image by jailing revisionist historians. Germany, the close ally of the US and the Israelis, jails revisionists and censors the Internet. The US is complicit in the German repression. Obama has met with German jailer Angela Merkel and praised her "democratic values."
Google acts as the enforcement arm of the religion of Holocaustianity, protecting it from scrutiny, skepticism and exposure. We are reproducing here correspondence from Google related to Google Inc.'s 2006 censorship of two of our revisionist videos from the Internet. What does Mrs. Clinton have to say about Google's censorship?
From Google Inc.
Google has been notified that your videos violate our Program Policies
The titles of the videos are listed at the end of this message.
According to our policy, we are removing the following videos:
World War Two Revisionist Charles Provan
Deborah Lipstadt, "Amalek" and David Irving
To review our Program Policies please visit:
http://video.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=27737&topic=1490
If you believe this removal was done in error, please respond to this
email. (End quote)
Feb. 22, 2006
***
The Google corporation defines "Holocaust" revisionism as "hate speech," and on that basis withdrew the Lipstadt and Provan videos from broadcast. The censored Lipstadt video demonstrated how "Holocaust" High Priestess Lipstadt had labeled historian David Irving "Amalek," which is incitement that could possibly lead to his death. The censored Charles Provan video consisted of an interview with a researcher who believes in the gas chambers and differs with mainstream historians only on certain details. Hence, even belief in the gas chambers, when it is not total belief, in every single detail of the "Holocaust" story, now constitutes "hate speech." If this is not totalitarianism, what is? Google initially approved these two videos and broadcast them for approximately one month. The videos were removed only due to outside pressure.
Deborah Lipstadt has publicly labeled my "Amalek" video about her, "revolting."
In 2006 in the Washington Post, William Bennett and Alan Dershowitz chastised the American media for having failed to publish the cartoons against Muhammad which first appeared in Denmark: "...radical Islamists have won a war of intimidation. They have cowed the major news media from showing these cartoons. The mainstream press has capitulated to the Islamists..."
Radical Judaics are also winning a war of intimidation. They have cowed Google into censoring a video critical of Deborah Lipstadt, and another video which maintains that the execution gas chambers existed, but that they were operated mainly by Judaics. Are "intimidation" and "capitulation" only wrong when they emanate from Islamic coercion? What about Judaic intimidation of the media? It must be at a higher level of power and control, because unlike the Islamic version, Judaic intimidation is not publicized in the US media. It is perpetrated largely without the knowledge of the public.
We protested Google's censorship. Here is Google's rejoinder:
FROM: GOOGLE VIDEO SUPPORT
To: Michael A. Hoffman II
Date: Wed Feb 22, 2006 08:00:17 PM PST
Subject: Re: [#47515979] Re: Google Video Policy Violation
Hi Mike,
Thank you for your email. We received complaints that your content violates our posted policy against hate speech.
Because the videos appear to promote Holocaust Revisionism, in violation of our policy against hate speech, we have removed the videos.
We appreciate your understanding.
Sincerely, The Google Video Team (end quote)
If you'd like to view the videos Google censored, they are available for purchase on DVD:
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/cgi-bin/store/agora.cgi?p_id=10017
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/cgi-bin/store/agora.cgi?p_id=10018
***
For further reference: Hoffman's Letter to China regarding Google and censorship
http://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2010/01/hoffmans-letter-to-china-concerning.html
http://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2010/01/hoffmans-letter-to-china-concerning.html
***
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/page1/page2/paypal.html
***
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
