Of Human Alchemy and the Gay Science

The Truth is Out in the Open for all Who Have Eyes to See

Of Human Alchemy and the Gay Science

By Michael Hoffman

Copyright ©2012 www. revisionisthistory.org 

My mentor, the late James Shelby Downard, looked at conspiracy data from many angles, including geo-occultic. He wondered why the creation and destruction of primordial matter (the world's first atomic bomb blast) occurred near the 33rd degree line of north parallel latitude; why it was was named the Trinity site, and occured on the ancient Jornada del Muerto ("Journey of the Dead Man"). He saw none of these sitings as "coincidental." He firmly believed that sorcery was not abandoned when Satanists engaged in science.

In my book Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare I pursued these research leads in terms of magical and masonic rites which were once secret and now very much in public, open-air -- a kind of civic magic, which is part of the human alcehmy of The Process.

By way of illustrating human alchemy let us recall that Friedrich Neitzsche popularized the nickname for alchemy, the "gay science."

In 1996, according to Pew Research, 65% of the American public opposed homosexual "marriage." That figure seems artificially low, but for purposes of argument, let's accept it, for the time being. Pew reports that in 2012 only 44% of the American people oppose homosexual marriage.

Even if the latter figure is also too low, there is no question that in a mere 16 years homosexual marriage has gained acceptance among an increasing number of Americans. The gay science marches on and manages to process Americans away from a bedrock of Christian civilization. We are not being processed toward a more conservative, Biblical America, but away from it. How is this done? The techniques are numerous, but one of them involves the Name Game. Homosexuality came to be called "gay" beginning in the 1970s, losing some of its stigma in the process. "Gay" marriage came to be called "same sex marriage" beginning in the late 1990s. Even that term was not sufficiently comsetic and neutral enough, so the alchemists cooked up the phrase "marriage equality" in the 21st century, and that too has been widely adopted as Newspeak. Who has the power to impose these name changes on our language? The purveyors of human alchemy.

What does this have to do with our patriotic nuclear weapons program that produced our patriotic holocausts in Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Everything. The atomic bomb was the zenith of the gay science that is also producing "marriage equalty," a "marriage equality" of which Jesus Christ was ignorant, since He defined marriage as follows: "From the beginning of the creation God made them male and female. For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and cleave to his wife; And they twain shall be one flesh: so then they are no more twain, but one flesh" (Mark 10:6-8).

One perversion is a reflection of another, but most people will not see this, nor do I expect them to see it. But those who do will have the "knowledge of the equilibrium." Modern Christians mostly do not have that discernment, though it is their patrimony by the Holy Spirit. God's enemies do possess it, by another spirit, a counterfeit Trinity Sight. It is a sad spectacle to witness the willful blindness of so many who blab about their allegiance to Jesus Christ.

In the following letter, the symbolism mentioned at the top of this note is linked to a phenomenon beyond the atomic bomb --the next stage of Skynet's alchemical advance: ubiquitous drones imposed not on Afghans, but the American people, as part of the same chimerical "war on terror" police state that "Veterans Against Obama" will inherit if and when they elect Masonic Mormon Mitt Romney, just as surely as it will still be in place if Obama is reelected.

I say "chimerical" because the US government sponsors the terror so it can keep extending and justifying a domestic police state to fight it. Certainly our support for the Al Qaeda terror bombers in Syria who recently killed the Syrian government's top Christian general, is evidence of that. For those who have eyes to see, that is. Most do not, because they have not the love of the truth by which they might be saved: "And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved" (2 Thessalonians 2:10).

Revelation of the Method = The 33rd degree of Truth or Consequences.

_______________________

LETTER TO HOFFMAN

Dear Mr. Hoffman

While perusing the "Antiwar.com" site I ran across an article concerning the next advances in "drone" warfare and the training facility for drone warfare personnel at Holloman Air Force Base in New Mexico. The details of the article deal with the usual talking points concerning drone warfare which you may review at:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/aug/02/drone-warfare-unmanned-weapons

The real "revelation" in the article is found in the paragraph which I have lifted in its entirety from the article:

"Such critics may consider it apt that Holloman straddles the Jornada del Muerto 'Journey of the Dead Man’ -- the macabre Spanish name for the perilous, waterless shortcut through the wilderness once used by Billy the Kid. Situated on a high desert plain, the base bakes by day, shivers by night and witnesses spectacular lightning storms. It has evocative neighbors. To the east, Roswell, which the conspiratorially minded already associate with humanless aircraft; to the west, Truth or Consequences, a town named after a 1950s radio quiz show."

As you stated so eloquently in Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare, the evidence is all around us out in the open for all to see!

H.N.
Ohio

_______________________

The latest issue of Michael Hoffman's hardcopy Revisionist History newsletter no. 63 is now being mailed to subscribers. 

Contents:

The Quadrennial Return of the 'Lesser of Two Evils’ Meme For the umpteenth time in recent memory, our hidden rulers have given us no choice in the upcoming presidential election. Michael Hoffman analyzes the implications of this lesser of two evils rerun in the 2012 election in terms of Mitt Romney and his criminal politics. We propose an effective alternative to this scam!  

Romney's Masonic Mormonism: Big players at high levels of the Mormon Church are backing Romney's presidency. What is Mormonism? What are its historic links to Freemasonry? Is Temple Mormonism a secret society? Is Mormonism part of the dictatorship of secret societies that rule America? Mormon Temple rituals are secret: we'll penetrate the curtain and reveal them to you, along with the secret history of the "God makers" - the Mormon church in America. 

Predictive programming and ritual stagecraft: The Batman movie shooting synchronicities: Hoffman examines the Aurora, Colorado movie theatre shootings: the hidden cryptocracy connections and ritualistic symbolism of yet another spectacular massacre in the American heartland, which the media are blaming on a "lone nut." 

Also: A Forgotten Sept. 11 Massacre • Israeli law-maker Michael Ben- Ari tears pages out of the New Testament and calls it "garbage" (Romney and Obama are silent). • The 007 Olympics • Gangster Mickey Cohen, and more 

To purchase this issue alone, or a subscription, click here:

http://revisionisthistorystore.blogspot.com/

(Exclusive subscriber content: Revisionist History Newsletter issues do not appear online)

_______________________

Read More

9/11 hijacked by fake heroes

Stuck pigs (and presstitutes) squeal

By Paul Craig Roberts

September 22, 2011

Nobel Laureate Paul Krugman

As an economist I have never had much patience with Paul Krugman’s economics, stuck as he is in 1940s-era Keynesian demand-side economics. I have sometimes concluded that Krugman had rather denounce Ronald Reagan that to acknowledge that supply-side economists have established that fiscal policy has supply-side, not just demand-side, effects.

However, Krugman does display at times a moral conscience. He did so on September 11 in his New York Times column, “The Years of Shame.” Krugman wrote that 9/11 was hijacked by “fake heroes” who used the event “to justify an unrelated war the neocons wanted to fight” and that “our professional pundits” lent their support to the misuse of the event.

The stuck pigs, of course, squealed loudly. The war criminal, Donald Rumsfeld, publicly cancelled his New York Times subscription, and the complicit presstitutes in Washington’s wars of aggression jumped on Krugman with spikes and hatchets.

Perhaps Krugman meant to use the plural and say “unrelated wars.” The US government has made war on Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya, resulting in massive destruction of homes, infrastructure, and lives of civilians, all in the name of one lie or the other. In addition, the US government is conducting military operations against the populations of three more Muslim countries—Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia, with extensive loss of civilian life in Pakistan, a US ally. Drones are sent in week after week that blow up schools, medical centers, and farm communities, and each time Washington announces that they have killed “militants,” “al Qaeda,” “Taliban leaders.”

Thanks to what Krugman calls “our professional pundits” and Gerald Celente calls “presstitutes,” the American people know little if anything about the murder of countless civilians and displacement of millions of others in these six Muslim countries, which the Bush/Obama governments regard as “security threats,” or habitats of small elements that are “security threats,” to the single super-power.
Before I continue, think for a minute about the level of threat posed by these Muslim countries that lack internal unity, an air force, a navy, a modern army, and nuclear ICBMs. Compare this “threat” to the Soviet threat, which, at least, was potentially real. The Soviets had the Red Army, which had defeated Hitler and his high-class war machine. The Soviet Union had an amazing array of extremely powerful ICBMs with single and multiple nuclear warheads, and nuclear submarines outfitted with nuclear-armed missiles.

Somehow we survived 46 years of this threat without going to war. But Iraq, which all but the most stupid people on earth now know had no “weapons of mass destruction,” was such a threat that the US government felt not only compelled to invade but also justified to lie to the United Nations in order to attack and destroy a country that had done nothing whatsoever to us and posed no threat whatsoever.

The same for Afghanistan. The Taliban posed no threat whatsoever to the United States or its European allies.

Pakistan is a US ally; yet, Washington has murdered thousands of Pakistani civilians. The liars in Washington and the presstitute media always claim that murdered civilians are “al Qaeda terrorists.” Every time Washington blows up a hospital, a farmer’s home, a school, Washington issues a report that it has just killed some al Qaeda leader. Some of these leaders have been reported killed multiple times.

I’m not surprised that this does not sit well with Paul Krugman. The best thing in the Keynesians’ resume is not their economics—although it was better, perhaps, than the economics that could not explain the Great Depression—but their moral conscience. Keynesian economists, for the most part, cared about people and what happened to them. I knew many of the Keynesians and debated before university and professional audiences a handful of Keynesian Nobel prize-winners. I never thought that they were callous people. I never expected to miss them.

To return to Krugman: His message comes across most powerfully in the presstitute pundits’ response to him. Michelle Malkin misinterpreted Krugman’s courage as cowardice and called him a “smug coward.”

“Coward” was an epithet that the presstitutes seized upon. A Washington Post writer, Erik Wimple, declared Krugman “cowardly.”

After establishing Krugman to be a “coward,” the presstitutes, who delight in murdering “towel-heads” in six countries, escalated their attack on Krugman. Peter Bella declared Krugman to be “vile” and to have “no conscience.”

Bella’s interpretation of a moral conscience as its antithesis is a typical presstitute response. It led to attacks on the New York Times for having a “cowardly,” “bewildering,” “arrogant,” “vile,” contributor who “has no conscience” as a columnist.

Jennifer Rubin in the Washington Post declared the New York Times for publishing Krugman’s column to be “a spiritual wasteland,” this from a “newspaper” that many regard as a CIA asset.

In other words, shut Krugman up. Cancel his column. We don’t want to hear anything from anyone that casts doubt on Washington’s murder, maiming, and dislocation of millions of people because of a “threat” that is a total lie. We are the exceptional nation. We are the light unto the world. Ordinary laws do not apply to us because we are exceptional. Laws are for underlings. We have “freedom and democracy.” Anyone who doubts us is evil and a terrorist and a pinko-liberal-commie.

It will be interesting to see if Krugman’s column survives his statement of truth. It will tell us whether America has succumbed totally to being the land of the liars, or whether a person of moral conscience still has a voice.

Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Treasury under Ronald Reagan. His latest book, How the Economy was Lost, has just been published by CounterPunch/AK Press. He can be reached at PaulCraigRoberts[at]yahoo.com

***

Hoffman's Afterward: It is almost certain that some self-righteous skeptics who doubt the official miracle story of how the buildings were destroyed in the attacks on Sept. 11, 2001 (a doubt I share - see this writer's review of David Ray Griffin's excellent new book, 9/11: Ten Years Later), will call Krugman to task for accepting the official account of 9/11, even as he criticizes how it was exploited by war criminals. They may even question Dr. Krugman's integrity. I strongly disagree with this refusal to acknowledge the good will and sincerity of some of the people who accept the official story of anything, whether it be the mystical statistic of "Six Million Jews"  killed by the Nazis, or the "science" of "global warming." If we despise everyone who does not doubt everything that we doubt, we will end up supporting an inquisition in reverse -- of true believers.  Exhibiting a Pharisaic pride in the fact that we don't believe what those "compromised Publicans" believe (Luke 18:9-14), doesn't help advance the cause of truth; more humility might.

***

Read More