Did Israeli Lobby Stage a Coup Against Petraeus?

Did the Israeli Lobby Stage a Coup Against the Director of the CIA?

New York Times Hints that the Downfall of Petraeus was Politically-Motivated

By Michael Hoffman

Motives Questioned in F.B.I. Inquiry of Petraeus E-Mails

By Scott Shane And Charlie Savage

New York Times online, Nov. 12, 2012

WASHINGTON — Is a string of angry e-mails really enough, in an age of boisterous online exchanges, to persuade the F.B.I. to open a cyberstalking investigation?

...e-mails sent anonymously to Jill Kelley...prompted the F.B.I. office in Tampa, Fla., to begin an investigation last June....The inquiry traced the e-mails to Mr. Petraeus’s biographer, Paula Broadwell ...Some commentators have questioned whether the bureau would ordinarily investigate a citizen complaint about unwanted e-mails, suggesting that there must have been a hidden motive, possibly political, to take action. 

...Ms. Kelley, a volunteer with wounded veterans and military families, brought her complaint to a rank-and-file agent she knew from a previous encounter with the F.B.I. office... Ms. Kelly was fairly prominent in Tampa social circles and had previously had dealings with the F.B.I. agent who took her complaint...That agent, who had previously pursued a friendship with Ms. Kelley and had earlier sent her shirtless photographs of himself, was “just a conduit” for the complaint, a law enforcement official said. He had no training in cybercrime, was not part of the cyber squad handling the case and was never assigned to the investigation...But the agent, who was not identified, continued to “nose around” about the case...

Later, the agent became convinced — incorrectly, officials say — that the case had stalled. Because of his “worldview,” as the official put it, he suspected a politically motivated cover-up to protect President Obama. The agent alerted Eric Cantor, the House majority leader, who called the F.B.I. director, Robert S. Mueller III, on Oct. 31 to tell him of the agent’s concerns. The official said the agent’s self-described “whistle-blowing” was “a little embarrassing” but had no effect on the investigation. (End quote from the New York Times online).

 There’s definitely a hint in the preceding report by the New York Times that Jill Kelley invites erotic responses from male FBI agents, one of whom was an asset of a powerful Israeli lobbyist, Republican Rep. Eric Cantor. On his own initiative this “shirtless” agent reported the case to Cantor. The New York Times does not say if this FBI agent breeched security by doing so.

Eric Cantor said “an F.B.I. employee whom his staff described as a whistle-blower told him about Mr. Petraeus's affair and a possible security breach in late October... 'I was contacted by an F.B.I. employee concerned that sensitive, classified information may have been compromised and made certain (FBI) Director Mueller was aware of these serious allegations and the potential risk to our national security,' Mr. Cantor said in a statement.” (New York Times online, Nov. 11).

 One wonders if Petraeus was set up, like Mordechai Vanunu; only in this case Broadwell may have been a patsy: “On Monday night, F.B.I. agents went to Ms. Broadwell’s home in Charlotte, N.C., and were seen carrying away what several reporters at the scene said were boxes of documents. A law enforcement official said Ms. Broadwell had consented to the search” (NY Times online, Nov. 12).

Her surrender of documents from her house without a search warrant would appall any competent defense attorney. It is the action of a scapegoat, or a person under some type of duress or mind control.

In 2010, General Petraeus fingered the Israeli-Palestine conflict as making life difficult for US troops in the Middle East and Afghanistan. His assessment violated the Israeli lobby’s sacred taboo against any such linkage:

“In March 2010, when Petraeus was still head of the US Central Command, he gave testimony to the Senate Armed Services Committee which included this observation about one of the “challenges to security and stability” faced by the United States:

"The enduring hostilities between Israel and some of its neighbors present distinct challenges to our ability to advance our interests in the AOR [Area of Operations]. Israeli-Palestinian tensions often flare into violence and large-scale armed confrontations. The conflict foments anti-American sentiment, due to a perception of U.S. favoritism for Israel. Arab anger over the Palestinian question limits the strength and depth of U.S. partnerships with governments and peoples in the AOR and weakens the legitimacy of moderate regimes in the Arab world...’

“Abraham Foxman, National Director of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) was so alarmed he issued a statement condemning Petraeus’ testimony, asserting in part of it: ‘Gen. Petraeus has simply erred in linking the challenges faced by the U.S. and coalition forces in the region to a solution of the Israeli-Arab conflict, and blaming extremist activities on the absence of peace and the perceived U.S. favoritism for Israel. This linkage is dangerous and counterproductive.’

“....Obama appointed Petraeus as CIA director after he made his Senate statement about Israel.” (Source: “When former CIA chief David Petraeus enraged the Israel lobby” http://electronicintifada.net/)

 In this writer’s opinion, the Petraeus sex scandal may have been intended to break during the presidential election campaign to embarrass Obama and cost him votes. The fact that it became public only after Nov. 6 shows that Obama’s forces inside the Cryptocracy successfully kept it under cover, and that’s some feat.

Nonetheless, there is a thinly-veiled message here for the President of the United States from the wing of the Cryptocracy which opposes him: we can bring you down too, if you don’t get on the Israeli bus and do the bidding of the necon war lobby, at least to the extent that your base will permit.

Of course, Petraeus should not have committed adultery. It is certainly gravely wrong. A man who will betray his wife will betray his country. But there are hundreds of high-level adulterers, to say nothing of thousands of practicing sodomites, working in La Cesspool Grande (Washington D.C.), who fornicate and sodomize with impunity. When one among this legion is singled out it is prudent to ask why.

Observe that the Zionist New York Times is subtly hinting at a possible conspiracy against Petraeus. By this means they display to the world the intimidating power of The Lobby. They don’t mind suggesting that Petraeus was deposed by hidden forces, knowing that informed observers are aware that Petraeus bucked the Israelis at one point in his career, and that’s all it takes for the axe to fall.

Unless serious investigative reporting and Congressional hearings dig up the conspirators behind this honey trap, we see in the Petraeus scandal a case of the Israeli lobby flexing its muscle on the national stage. The warning to Obama and his allies is unmistakable: pay and obey -- or else. It’s the old mobster’s dictum and that’s who Petraeus and company are dealing with -- hoodlum grandees with the power to ruin the director of America’s Central Intelligence Agency.

Think about the kind of clout this represents and then ask yourself, does anyone in gentile America have the power to depose the director of Mossad? Not bloody likely.

Petraeus was brought down in a coup d’etat. He is fortunate it happened like this, rather than in that other classic gangland sendoff, the arranged “accident” -- the chemically-induced heart attack; the automobile with “defective” brakes that sails off a cliff, or a strategic shove, like the one that led to the defenestration of Secretary of Defense James Forrestal in 1949.

Hoffman is a former reporter for the New York bureau of the Associated Press, where he investigated the Son of Sam and Double Initial serial murders. His latest book is Usury in Christendom: The Mortal Sin that Was and Now is Not, due to be published by Independent History and Research in December. He edits Revisionist History Newsletter. As an independent scholar Hoffman’s writing is funded by the sale of his publications and broadcasts, and donations mainly from the working poor and middle class.

***

Read More

Where are the “Hate Crime” laws when we need them?

The vital information freely distributed in today's On the Contrary is made possible by donations from readers and the sale of our books, newsletters and recordings

Michael Hoffman's Note: The American media stink. I'm not apologizing for using a crude term to describe the "journalism" of the NBC and CBS television affiliates in Sacramento and the Sacramento Bee newspaper, or most of the other "mainstream" media in the U.S. Their reporting of the truly dissident and marginal is usually a disgrace. Here is the latest egregious example, highlighted by retired Army officer Archer Frey, who commanded troops during the 1965 Watts Riots in Los Angeles. (Michael Hoffman is a former reporter for the Associated Press).

__________________________________________________

 Where are the “Hate Crime” laws when we need them?

By Archer C. Frey  archerfrey@gmail.com 

• Exclusive to The Hoffman Wire | www.revisionisthistory.org •

On 27 February 2012, the popular 4:00 p.m. Dr. Oz medical information television show was interrupted to transmit live pictures of a near riot occurring at the California State Capitol building in Sacramento, California. The local NBC-TV affiliate showed police under siege, using horse-mounted California Highway Patrol officers and Sacramento City motorcycle police officers, in attempting to suppress a riot brought on by the activities, so the media outlet said of a “White Supremacists” group activity.

Both the NBC and the CBS stations fed live pictures and later taped segments at the 5 o’clock and 10 o’clock news. In their voice over narration both NBC and CBS repeatedly use the term “White Supremacists”. While there were some short acknowledgments (no amplification), that the South African Project Group had valid permits, and a mob from the “Occupy Oakland” movement was attacking the South African group, both MSM outlets made it clear that the problem was with the South African group for being there in the first place. Both MSM repeatedly use the statement “White Supremacists.” The authors of the Sacramento Bee article used the white supremacists canard only once, but put it into a form of denial, reporting; “The South Africa Project protesters denied they are white supremacists.” However the Bee could not resist one last jab in the picture description calling the South Africa Project group a “pro-white group.”

So much for objectivity.

While Californians are aware of the distances involved, those outside of the state are not aware that Oakland is over 80 miles from Sacramento. (For comparison New York City is a little over 90 miles from Philadelphia.)  So to move a group of some 100 people, headcount underestimated, or inflated, depending on your goal for media impact, some eighty miles takes a good amount of coordination. No MSM or the Sacramento Bee article, see below, mention this fact.

The near riot closed downtown Sacramento and the Capitol from around 3:00 p.m. in the afternoon until nearly 6:00 p.m., stopping traffic and closing off entire city blocks, yet the Bee relegated their article to page 3. It took the paper some 228 words of a 676 word construction, or one-third of the article, to inform the reader that the South African group had a permit. Nor were viewers and readers reprised of the violence in Oakland caused by the “Occupy Oakland” element, including the January 28, 2012 incident where police had to resort to the use of tear gas. The MSM and the Huffington Post all reported that the core element of the Oakland trouble resulted from some 100 individuals that refused a lawful order to disperse. 

One wonders if the 100 or so in Sacramento might be this same 100 strong element? As an aside, this Oakland use of tear gas was the first time that I recall its large scale California use since the “People’s Park” Berkeley riots of 1967. Notice that the media emphasis is on the harm to the police. No mention, let alone expanded coverage, of what happen to the group assembling legally, except, “the counter-protesters hurled bottles, rocks and paint-filled eggs at the officers and those they were protecting …”

But the bigger problem is in the application, or in this case, the non-application of the 2000 era, ADL, (Anti-Defamation League) instituted “hate crime” laws.

The call for investigation and the potential for “special circumstances” and “hate crime” conditions is totally absent.  If you are not part of an identified “victim” group you have no special circumstances to wrap around your rights. A mob can attack your authorized, permitted, constitutionally protected assembly and those attacked are just supposed to “suck it up” and let it go.

Truly, we are now under the control of malevolent forces.

Archer C. Frey is a retired US Army member. His service to the State of California and the United States extended over the period 1945 to 1991. In 1965, during the Watts Riots, Frey commanded a 500 man National Guard force in South Los Angeles. Frey’s earliest US ancestors arrived in Massachusetts Bay in 1635.

________________________________

Two officers injured, three arrested as protesters clash near state Capitol

 By Hudson Sangree  [hsangree@sacbee.com], Steve Magagnini and Torey Van Oot |  Sacramento Bee  

February 28, 2012, p. 3A

http://www.sacbee.com/2012/02/28/4295880/pp-efpf-fpsejf-psoe-fse-af-spof.html

[Archer Frey's Note: No mention in the following newspaper report of any injuries or harm done to the peacefully assembled, law-abiding group that was violently attacked by the hate-filed mob]

A mini-melee broke out near the state Capitol on Monday, with at least two officers injured and three people arrested, after Occupy Oakland protesters and others hurled objects at police and at a group claiming thousands of whites have been killed by blacks in South Africa. The protest by South Africa Project began relatively calmly. At noon, members took up position on the Capitol’s south steps for a three-hour protest of what they called “White Genocide in South Africa.” Their literature claims that as of December, more than 3,000 white farmers of European origin had been murdered in South Africa in racially motivated attacks.

Meanwhile, a multiethnic group of about 100 protesters was separated from them by police officers on horses. Those protesters chanted: “Hey, hey. Ho, ho. You Nazi f---s have got to go.

”

The South Africa Project protesters denied they are white supremacists. “For some reason, when a white person tries to stick up for an issue based on race, they’re automatically labeled racist, neo-Nazi Klan members,” said coordinator Michael Myers, an electrician from Oakland.

The group’s website, which later proclaimed the demonstration a success, chided “those of you who call yourselves White Nationalists” who didn’t participate.

At times the protesters and counter-protesters shouted back and forth, said California Highway Patrol spokesman Sean Kennedy. “I heard yelling from both sides,” he said. “It was mutual.”

The South Africa group had a permit to protest on the Capitol steps, but the others did not and so couldn’t go on the Capitol grounds. They yelled from the sidewalk. At 3 p.m., extra CHP and Sacramento police officers were called in to escort the South Africa protesters from the Capitol to a parking garage at 10th and L streets.

The officers kept the counter-protesters – including those who arrived later marching under a banner that said “Occupy Oakland” – on the opposite side of the street. Some wore dark bandanas over their faces.

“It’s the wild, wild West, motherf-----s,” they chanted. “The system is racist, you are all disgraces.”

As both groups approached the parking garage, the counter-protesters hurled bottles, rocks and paint-filled eggs at the officers and those they were protecting, according to Kennedy and Sacramento Police spokeswoman Laura Peck.

One CHP officer, sitting on a large draft horse, rode into the crowd of counter-protesters while other officers tried to apprehend those they suspected of throwing objects. The group scattered, with police in pursuit. One CHP bicycle officer chased down and tackled a fleeing suspect, but he appeared to be injured after the man was handcuffed and taken away. Sitting on the sidewalk, the officer had blood on his chin and pointed to his knee, as if to indicate he was hurt. Another CHP officer held his hands over his face while colleagues put their hands on his shoulders. An ambulance driver said the officer had been pepper sprayed.

Kennedy said Monday evening that at least two CHP officers suffered minor injuries and at least three counter-protesters were arrested by the CHP for resisting arrest. Another counter-protester was arrested earlier in the day, he said. Peck said no Sacramento police officers were injured, though some were doused with paint. The ruckus drew a heavy police reponse. It snarled traffic and disrupted service on light rail’s Blue Line from 3 to 4:30 p.m., a Regional Transit spokeswoman said.

As news of the event spread, organizers of Occupy Sacramento said in a statement they were not involved. “Occupy Sacramento adheres to a strict nonviolence policy,” the statement said. “We do not fight police, even if they are the perpetrators of violence, as they have been at Occupy demonstrations.” One Occupy Sacramento protester at the scene, who goes by the name of Faygo, said it was after the Occupy Oakland protesters arrived that things got rowdy.

“I can’t really blame Oakland,” he said. “They deal with a lot of police brutality, so a lot of them have a lot more animosity toward the police.

“It just takes one person to throw a stone,” he said, “and you’ve got chaos.”

Call The Bee’s Hudson Sangree, (916) 321-1191. The Bee’s Cathy Locke and photographer Randy Pench contributed to this report. 

 A California Highway Patrol bicycle officer sits injured on a sidewalk near the state Capitol in Sacramento on Monday after tackling a protester with the Occupy group that was taunting members of a pro-white group called the South Africa Project, which held a three-hour rally on the building’s south steps.

__________________________________________________

Read More

Bishop Williamson Contra Mundum

By Michael Hoffman

On Oct. 19 we reported that the Conference of European Rabbis and the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith had ordered Pope Benedict XVI to drop negotiations with the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) until such time as they reeducate or silence their Bishop Richard N. Williamson.

In his Eleison Comments column last week, Williamson repeated 1965 years of Catholic teaching about the responsibility for the death of Jesus Christ. He reasoned ably, citing the fact that Pontius Pilate would have never ordered Christ’s crucifixion had it not been for the demands of the majority of the Jews of Palestine.

Collective Guilt is Talmudic

We would not have published Bishop Williamson’s column had he not referred to “noble exceptions” among the Jews who did not have a hand in Christ’s death. In our own writing we have always emphasized that the notion of collective racial guilt, such as the Allied World War II doctrine that every German man, woman and child was collectively guilty of Nazi crimes and deserved death, is a reflection of a rabbinic mentality. The same collective guilt attitude is at work in the Israeli state where all Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank are seen as bearing responsibility for the crimes of Hamas and deserving of death; or for example, all prisoners released by the Israelis in return for Gilad Shalit are terrorists and criminals; none of them innocent of the charges made against them. All of this is Talmudic.

Therefore, when people stoop to draw parallels between today’s Judaics and those who demanded their Messiah’s execution 2000 years ago, declaring these 21st century Judaics collectively guilty, we err grievously on the side of the Talmudic mentality and become, in a spiritual sense, rabbis ourselves.

It must be understood that rabbinic agents are in our midst. Here is a counter-intelligence secret: the rabbis wish to sow in all movements that contest Judaism and the Talmud a collective disparagement toward all Judaics without exception, leaving them nowhere to turn among gentiles and Christians for safe haven or liberation. Consequently, they step backward into the waiting arms of their rabbinic oppressors.

Contemporary Judaics only share in the responsibility for Christ’s death spiritually and ideologically if they are adherents of Judaism or a hyper-chauvinist Zionism with a strong ethnic, tribal component. A poor schmuck who was born a “Jew” (more likely a Khazar but I will not stress the point here), is not at fault for the circumstance of his birth. In the 1920s many German-Judaics wanted freedom from the rabbis. They were admirers of Bach and Beethoven, German science and literature. They had served patriotically in the Great War. They sought to progress beyond the ghetto. They desired to share in the freedom of Western Civilization. Instead, they were collectively rebuffed and told that they possessed ineradicable genetic tendencies toward subversion and degeneracy. This is the rabbinic doctrine about gentiles and it was projected, through an occult mirror, by the German nationalist leadership of the 1920, 30s and 40s onto Judaics.

Noble Exceptions Among “the Jews"

Bishop Williamson’s column eschewed that self-destructive rut by citing "noble exceptions" among the Judaics, and fingering, not their supposed attachment to the “old covenant” (the uninformed mistake Judaism for Karaitism), but to the Talmud, which nullifies from the Mishnah onward, the Old Testament. Without these two precise distinctions which the bishop made, we could not have circulated his column.

Hence, the writing at issue was free of racism, indicted the correct source of rabbinic perversion (Talmud) and otherwise repeated foundational truths that the spiritual heirs of the Pharisees in our midst today can no more bear to read than their ideological ancestors could bear to hear from the lips of Jesus Himself. 

This is a very old war of ideas. Because the allies of the rabbis have massive clout with the media of the West it was decided,  in the early 60s, that the papacy would seek accommodation ("aggiornamento”) with the modern world, and bend the entire mission of the Church away from proclaiming the radical truth of the Gospel toward avoiding giving offense to those who can’t endure its truth. 

Due to that momentous alteration, we now find ourselves on the stage of an absurdist theatre where Benedict XVI is ordered by the spiritual sons of the Pharisees to punish the bishop and his priestly SSPX fraternity for daring to say in public what St. Matthew, St. Paul and the Fathers of the early church taught and proclaimed concerning who was responsible for the crucifixion of Christ.

This is an extraordinary state of affairs in that it puts all authentic Christians under an obligation: to be considered good goyim free of the antisemitism libel, we must agree to refrain from shouting that the emperor has no clothes. Or we can choose to dare to speak truth to power in the face of the rabbinic chutzpah which presumes to censor the speech of the Church of Jesus Christ by ordering us to affirm a lie.

Decades ago the Church of Rome did just that with the document Nostra Aetate (“In Our Time”), contradicting the New Testament and agreeing with the rabbis that the ancient Jews were not responsible for the execution of Israel’s Messiah.

Auschwitz Over Calvary

Every once in a while, even in our degenerate days, a churchman of Williamson’s mettle arises and proclaims the truth irrespective of the pressure, and pays a terrible price for it, in earthly terms anyway. The propaganda system being what it is, he can’t be allowed to do so purely; the waters must be muddied and the truth-teller defamed. Mixed into reports of Bishop Williamson proclaiming the Biblical truth about the deicide were media allusions to his “conviction” in a German court for “denying the Holocaust.”

By this label we are made to think, Ah, he’s a convicted criminal; a shady character, a felon. There is always considerable shame attached to those who contest the Talmudic imperium. The Son of God was stripped nearly naked and made to appear as a felon deserving of death. No true follower of His can expect anything less.

In Germany defense attorneys can be jailed for offering too vigorous a defense of their World War II revisionist clients, and judges sanctioned for failing to convict a revisionist defendant. The western media doesn't report this because it would impugn the verdict issued by the German-Zionist kangaroo court (forgive my candor but this is a precise description of the “justice” dispensed by that judiciary).

Bishop Williamson never “denied the Holocaust.” He did undertake a very human and Biblical act -- he doubted a Judaic fable (Titus 1:14), that six million Judaic persons died and many of them perished in "gas chambers" in Auschwitz.

Odd, is it not, that anyone in Germany may doubt the Resurrection of Christ and the Virgin Birth or even the every existence of Jesus, with complete freedom and no fear of prosecution? Yet to doubt the homicidal gas chambers of Auschwitz is a crime punishable by five years’ imprisonment. Pope John Paul II called Auschwitz the new Golgotha and this writer has for decades argued that Auschwitz has replaced Calvary as the central and defining pole star in the western ontology of sacred suffering. Would it not be safe to say that the evidence for this revolutionary reversal can be found in the criminal penalties attached to so-called “holocaust denial” and the freedom by which "Resurrection denial” and even denial that Jesus ever existed, are promoted throughout the media, academia and the Internet?

Oh, but it is not very prudent or politic for Williamson to take on both the deicide and the gas chambers. Not at this time. He is a hand grenade! Uranium! He destroys the hermeneutic of continuity, the negotiations of the Vatican diplomatic corps, the delicate, behind-the-scenes arrangements.

And to this we say, hallelujuah! Fresh air at last. The truth at last, at whatever cost to reputation or bank account. If we had a dozen Richard Williamsons in high places we would convert Judaics and cause the rabbinic liars and masonic ADLers to back into their shuls and confine their prevarications to  the precincts of their eruv.

Modernist Catholicism Constitutes Jew Hate

But the reverse prevails for the present time and Jew-haters infest the Vatican.

Say what? Yes, Jew haters: this pope, the last three, and those who persecute Bishop Williamson, Jew haters all. Jesus Christ loved His people and that is why he retailed to them difficult truths. The demonic spirit of the modern age declares that if we love the “Jew” we will encourage him in his sins and mendacity. What is asked of loved ones: introspection, examination of conscience and self-reflection, is denied to the Judaics out of deference to their engorged egos. This is hatred.

We bow to them and thereby encourage their pride and chutzpah, intransigence, racism, and religion of lies. We sentence their women to the pathological and destructive "family purity” (sic) laws of Chazal, the halachos of niddah, with all the suffering and oppression of women which that insanity entails. We sentence their men to absolute obedience to the rabbis and thousands of rules that daily micro-manage their lives, along with the burden of institutionalized contempt for goyim and Christians.

Pope Benedict XVI requires nothing of “Jews” in the Name of Christ. No repudiation of rabbinic racism or violence. No apology for Kol Nidrei or Birkat HaMinim, just more appeasement of their megalomania. Here is the operation of occult Jew hate, so long concealed since the Renaissance and now in the open. There is more love for Judaic people in one line of a radical call to repentance and conversion from Bishop Williamson than in all the lucubrations of the Nostra Aetate Church of Rome.

Rabbinic and Zionist bigots and their Vatican enablers will go wild in the days and weeks ahead, as they always do in the face of a truth that scalds their souls. They will do their best to gibbet Bishop Williamson from the highest pole of their unending vengeance.

Where stand you in this great battle?

Copyright©2011

Hoffman is the author of Judaism’s Strange Gods, forthcoming at the end of November from Independent History and Research.

***

Coming Soon: ADDRESSING THE LONG OVERDUE NEED FOR JUDAIC SELF-CRITICISM ABOUT THE JUDAIC HERITAGE OF ANTI-CHRISTIAN HATE. WE WILL PROVE THAT THE BIRKAT HAMINIM FUNCTIONED WITHOUT QUESTION IN THE MEDIEVAL WORLD AS A RABBINIC CURSE ON CHRISTIANS.

***

Read More

Guilt by association: Zionist smear-media specialty

The Anatomy of Smears

Goldberg smears Mearsheimer through guilt-by-association with Gilad Atzmon
How Jesse Jackson was smeared through guilt-by-association with Louis Farrakhan

Researched and compiled by Michael Hoffman 
www.revisionisthistory.org • Sept. 23, 2011

For the past two months, in between writing issue 58 of Revisionist History newsletter, I have been at work on a book that people have repeatedly asked me for since my 1100 page volume, Judaism Discovered, was published in 2008: a condensed summation of its research and thesis for the general reader, priced to sell in an affordable paperback. I did something like that in 2000 with a thin paperback entitled Judaism's Strange Gods that served as a groundwork for Judaism Discovered.

The new condensed book will take the form of a revived edition of Judaism's Strange Gods, though it will differ substantially from the 2000 edition, benefiting from my research into Judaism Discovered and subsequent material I have gathered since 2008. Judaism's Strange Gods: Revised and Expanded is now finished except for the index, which I am completing over this weekend. We will have details on a pre-publication sale offer in the near future.

In the midst of these publishing projects, it has been a while since I offered you a column. I thought I would give you a double-bonus and cram two columns into one.

The first is a hysterical libel of Gilad Atzmon, a Judaic who has written a new book (The Wandering Who?) that presses all the buttons on the aging propaganda machine that generates Jeffrey Goldberg's frenzied boilerplate ("self-hater, twisted and toxic hater, antisemitism, neo-Nazi, Holocaust denial, grotesque medieval calumnies, conspiracy theories"). This is the Talmudic pilpul that passes for journalism and substitutes for a reasoned argument in Goldberg's mental shetl. He plays to the choir but, admittedly, his choir is large. He's a columnist for The Atlantic magazine and is interviewed by NPR in spite of the fact that Mr. Goldberg helped to lie America into the Iraq war, an apparent venial sin which hasn't dented his media cred. (I did an analysis of Goldberg's relationship with NPR; a video of my brief talk is on YouTube).

We also offer part one of a transcript of a speech by Louis Farrakhan. There is a connection: Mr. Farrakhan talks of how Jesse Jackson was smeared because of his relationship with Farrakhan, and Mr. Goldberg, in his Atlantic column, uses Mr. Atzmon (through no fault of the latter) in a guilt-by-assocation smear of Prof. John Mearsheimer, one of the most reputable and courageous critics of Israeli racism and state terror in American academia. It is Goldberg's task to libel and stigmatize Mearsheimer. Mr. Goldberg exploits Gilad Atzmon in order to achieve this, in the same way Farrakhan's relationship with Jesse Jackson was used to damage the reputation of Mr. Jackson.

Pilpulistic tactics are tiresome -- but dependable as clockwork -- and often highly effective in ostracizing and silencing peace makers and thinkers who are independent of the propaganda requirements of Zionism and Holocaustianity.

Jeffrey Goldberg himself endorses apologists for Israeli killers, denies the holocaust against the Palestinians and helped fake America into the Iraq war, but let's not confuse people with the facts. Goldberg's tantrum is worth studying as counterintelligence, a way to gauge the hallaf of one of yiddishkeit's leading inquisitors.

The following information is brought to you by the donors who support this service. Without their donations this service cannot continue. Consider joining other truth seekers by sending a donation today.

Best wishes in this Great Battle,
Michael Hoffman
Box 849, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816 USA

Smear #1

John Mearsheimer Endorses a Hitler Apologist and Holocaust Revisionist
By JEFFREY GOLDBERG

Gilad Atzmon is a jazz saxophonist who lives in London and who has a side gig disseminating the wildest sort of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. He is an ex-Israeli and a self-proclaimed "self-hater" who traffics in Holocaust denial and all sorts of grotesque, medieval anti-Jewish calumnies. Here is a small sample of Atzmon's lunatic thoughts:

"I think that 65 years after the liberation of Auschwitz, we must be entitled to start to ask the necessary questions. We should ask for some conclusive historical evidence and arguments rather than follow a religious narrative that is sustained by political pressure and laws. We should strip the holocaust of its Judeo-centric exceptional status and treat it as an historical chapter that belongs to a certain time and place. Sixty-five years after the liberation of Auschwitz we should reclaim our history and ask why? Why were the Jews hated? Why did European people  stand up against their next door neighbors? Why are the Jews hated in the Middle East, surely they had a chance to open a new page in their troubled history? If they genuinely planned to do so, as the early Zionists claimed, why did they fail? Why did America tighten its immigration laws amid the growing danger to European Jews? We should also ask for what purpose do the holocaust denial laws serve? What is the holocaust religion there to conceal? As long as we fail to ask questions, we will be subjected to Zionists and their Neocons agents' plots. We will continue killing in the name of Jewish suffering. We will maintain our complicity in Western imperialist crimes against humanity......The Holocaust  became the new Western religion. Unfortunately, it is the most sinister religion known to man. It is a license to kill, to flatten, no nuke, to wipe, to rape, to loot and to ethnically cleanse. It made vengeance and revenge into a Western value." (End quote from Atzmon).

...Rather unbelievably (or believably, depending on where you sit)...The R. Wendell Harrison Distinguished Service Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago, and co-author of "The Israel Lobby," John J. Mearsheimer...has written an endorsement of Atzmon's new book, "The Wandering Who?"...Mearsheimer is endorsing the writing of a man who espouses neo-Nazi views. In other words, he's not even bothering to make believe anymore -- he's moved from a self-described critic of Israel to a corrosive critic of Jewry itself. The blogger Adam Holland, like yours truly, didn't quite believe that Mearsheimer would endorse such a crude anti-Semite...

READ MORE OF GOLDBERG'S SCURRILOUS ATTACK ON ATZMON AND MEARSHEIMER HERE.

Smear #2

Minister Louis Farrakhan speaks of his relationship with Jesse Jackson and the Jews
Excerpted from NOI Research Group Weekly Report--Volume 2, Issue 37 (September, 2011)

The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan has been personally attacked for two decades by Caucasian Jews who have attempted to label him an “anti-Semite.” The charge is absurd and the accusers have been shown to be the biggest profiteers in the trans-Atlantic slave trade and other crimes against Black humanity. But in this lecture by Min. Farrakhan at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst on March 9, 1994, the Minister explained in detail the real issues behind the controversy between Blacks and Jews. Here is the first of a three-part transcript of that historic lecture.

[....] So I would like to address in my closing some solutions, and the Black–Jewish dialogue, if you will, and Farrakhan’s being embroiled in the middle of this kind of controversy. And you can take it or leave it. I have never been anti-Semitic; I’m not now. I have never been anti-Jewish, and I’m not now. But if I recognize something, and what I recognize is not in the best interest of Jews or Blacks, I have to speak against it. And those who fear paint me in all kinds of positions. But I’m here now to defend myself. I never started any conflict with Jewish people. Never! Never. I stum- bled into it. (Laughter.) ’Cause I did.

SUPPORT FOR JESSE JACKSON

I fell in love with Jesse Jackson, my brother, and Jesse told me he wanted to run to be president. He asked me for my help. I said, “Brother, I don’t know anything about politics.” He said, “Would you help me?” I said, “I’ll think about it and I’ll let you know.” We thought about it, we in the Nation of Islam, we talked about it, and we agreed that we would help Reverend Jackson. When Jesse Jackson gave up his position at PUSH to consider running for the nomination of his party for president, he made the announcement, everybody stood and applauded. Farrakhan sat and the tears rolled down my eyes because I knew that the Reverend Jackson was embarking on a course that could lead to his untimely death. Some people rejoice to see a man make that kind of move. Other people who understand what that move entails are deeply sensitive to the danger. I was deeply sensitive to the danger. I had never seen a dossier on anybody by the ADL (Anti-Defamation League) until Jesse Jackson’s assistant, Reverend Barrow, showed me an ADL dossier on Reverend Jackson. And in their dossier, Reverend Jackson was an “anti- Semite.” I want you to listen to me. That dossier was put in the hands of media so that when Jesse would speak, they would raise questions out of that dossier to keep Jesse embroiled in a conflict with members of the Jewish community.

That raised money, but it also would be put in a context that would cut Jesse from support from the common Gentiles of this nation. In February of 1984, ten years ago, Reverend Jackson informed me that there were over 100 real threats on his life. He was told that by the FBI. He was frankly worried, and so was I. So at my convention — the convention of the Nation of Islam — I was introducing Reverend Jackson that year, and in my introduction if you read my words, if you’re a fair-minded person, you could never say that I was anti-Semitic. I appealed to the Jewish community and I said to them that whenever the interests of Jews and Blacks converged, Blacks and Jews always worked together. But when we come of age—meaning we mature, in our self-interest — we have to follow our self-interest, even if our self-interest causes us to be at variance with the interest of the Jewish community.

“RUIN JESSE”

I said, Reverend Jackson is our enlightened self-interest. I said, and the way you handle him can rupture Black–Jewish relations because 90 percent of the Black electorate was lining up behind Reverend Jackson, and members of the Jewish Defense League had interrupted Jesse Jackson’s announcement of his candidacy in Washington, D.C. I was present; I saw it. Then a full-page ad was taken out in the New York Times saying, “Ruin, Jesse, Ruin!”

Because the chant among Black people was, “Run, Jesse, Run!”  And this group called Jews Against Jesse took out an ad saying, “Ruin, Jesse, Ruin!”

Wait a minute. In a political campaign if you don’t like your candidate or the op-ponent, you defeat his program—you attack him intelligently. You put an ad in the paper —“Ruin”? What does the word “ruin” mean? Hmm?

When something is ruined — that garment that you have on that you paid whatever you paid for it — if it is ruined, do you put it on again? To ruin Jesse was the aim of those who put that ad in the New York Times. No responsible Jewish organization condemned that ad. (Applause.) I want you to listen. Now I want you to hear Farrakhan. Since you heard so much about me, now hear me, and give me the same ear that you gave my detractors.

"IF ANY HARM COMES TO HIM, HE'LL BE THE LAST BLACK MAN THAT YOU'LL KILL."

When I spoke, Brother Yusuf Muhammad put my words on this campus in a flyer. Those were my exact words. If you’re sane and intelligent, there’s not one anti-Semitic statement or anti-Jewish statement there. I called on the Jews to sit down and talk with Reverend Jackson. “If you disagree with him,” I said, “we can stand to lose an election, but we cannot stand to lose Reverend Jackson.” I said, “If any harm comes to him, he’ll be the last Black man that you’ll kill.”

Wait, wait, wait, I didn’t finish, no, no— ’cause that’s an implied threat. I said, “We don’t carry weapons. We’re not allowed to carry as much as a pen knife,” I said, “But Almighty God has caused this son of ex-slaves to rise up to such a position, and God Himself will retaliate.”

This is a paraphrase of my actual words, which, they’re out here for you to read. The next day in New York the head of B’nai B’rith was on the radio, calling me “the new black Hitler.”

Let’s stop right there.

Now, I grew up in Roxbury. I went to the Sherwin School, and Boston Public Latin. Didn’t make it there. I graduated from Boston English. I went to Huntington Prep School. Go and search my record. I hardly ever had a fight in my whole life. I’ve never been arrested. All my friends, if you talk to them, they have nothing evil to say about me. I’ve never been a violence-prone individual; not then, not now. All human beings, however, are capable, if pushed to that extreme. I have never said privately to my children, or publicly, Jews should be exterminated. My sons and daughters have grown up in my house. They have never heard me speak of Jews or Italians or Hispanic people using slang terms like “spic” or “kike” or “wop.” I don’t talk like that because I know what it feels like to be called a “nigger” all my life. (Applause.)

 But anybody that knows me from my childhood knows I was a young man of principle and if you wanted a fight outta me, then the fight would never be on no stupid thing, it would always be over a violation of a principle. That’s my history.

"POPE PIUS XII LOOKED THE OTHER WAY" (AS 'JEWS' WERE PUT IN OVENS)

And to call me Hitler. Every young Jew in this audience, whose parents or grandparents went through the Holocaust. What does it mean to them when you say I am a Hitler? Every young Jew would hate that man and want him dead because nobody wants to see a Hitler come up again. What makes me a new black Hitler? We never put Jews in ovens. Not one Black person in this audience has put a Jew in an oven. Gentiles did. Pope Pius XII looked the other way. Franklin Delano Roosevelt looked the other way. (Applause.) You know it. Black people were your liberators from Auschwitz! The first ones in the death camps were Black people. (Applause.)

Now Farrakhan is upset. And shouldn’t I be? If somebody called you a Hitler, wouldn’t you be upset? But why did you call me Hitler? Because of my skill as an orator. Unmatched— no vanity, no vanity, no vanity, no ego. God has given me that gift. I move people. I move people not because I move people. I move people because I am an instrument that communicates to the nth degree to human beings and their pain. I don’t need notes. I speak from the soul, and my speech is like music. Even though it may be uncomfortable some of the passages are so beautiful, because I’m not a hater. I’m passionate over the suffering of my people in particular, but human beings in general.

"HITLER WAS A GENIUS"

So I was inflamed, and I...said, “So here come the Jews now, calling me Hitler.” I said, “Well, that’s a good name.” I said Hitler was no good for me but he rose Germany up from the ashes of her defeat in World War I. Hitler, with his magnificent oratory, made a people with his philosophy and ideology of Aryan supremacy. He made a people in Germany, and it took the whole western world united to defeat [him]. A nation of only 17 million people had the whole world shake with their genius. Hitler was a genius. The West had deciphered his codes and they let whole towns be bombed so that Hitler would not know that they knew. They knew his commands through his generals. As his generals got it, they got it. And even with that, it took the combined might of all of Europe and America to defeat that man.

I said he was a great man, but he was wickedly great. And I am not wrong. That’s your English language. In the Oxford Dictionary, there are four pages on the word great. Only one of them, one line, says great in a way that it means something laudatory. All the rest is talking about magnitude, significance, impact. The man was great, but he was wicked. I can’t approve of another man putting human beings in ovens—men, women, children. I’m a father. I’m a grandfather. I love my children, and when I look at Jewish children and Palestinian children growing the way they’re growing, to kill each other down the road — I’m hoping that some way we can break that chain. And I know that the only thing that will break it is truth and justice.

But because Zionists saw a threat in Reverend Jackson’s appeal, since Reverend Jackson had embraced Arafat, several years before Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon Peres. Jackson was hated for embracing Arafat, and since it was feared that Reverend Jackson, if given a platform, could disturb the delicate balance between the Blacks who were all pro-Israel to turn Black people maybe to a pro-Palestinian stance, then to that degree it was in the Zionists’ self-interest to destroy the candidacy of Reverend Jackson by any means necessary. And so, they, when I said Hitler was great, headline came up in the New York Post: “Jackson Pal Hails Hitler.”

Now Farrakhan is the whipping boy. They’re beating the hell out of me to get to Jesse. After a while Jesse can’t take it anymore. He repudiates Farrakhan, leaving me out there now by myself. It’s all right though. It’s all right. I didn’t come in the world with no twin. (Applause.) I don’t need an army behind me to stand up for what I believe. I was made that way and as long as God is with me, then I’m never alone. So now I’m out there. I refused to divide the Black people who were behind Jesse, who loved Farrakhan. I refused to speak evil against my brother because he had repudiated me. This is history. And when I learned that the (U.S.) Senate had condemned me and repudiated me, a vote of 95 to nothin.’ A white Senate. No Black people in it. “Representative” government had repudiated me, for allegedly calling Judaism a gutter religion, which I never did.

I am a man that is not afraid to tell you that I said that, ’cause anything that I say,I back it up. And if I can’t back it up with truth, I’ll apologize to you, for so stating or being in error. I think that’s the proper thing to do. But I never said that. And you know what’s worse? It’s ten years now. And every time they write about Farrakhan, [it’s]: “the man that called Hitler great and Judaism a gutter religion.” That’s the way they put me before you.

Well, since [they believe] Black folk are natural liars and cowards, then my saying, “I didn’t say that; here’s what I said and here’s what I meant”— oh, that don’t mean anything to you. So you never took what I said to have any weight at all, because what you say is the truth, and whatever a Black man says in defense of himself he’s only trying to get out from what his own mouth has spoken. You don’t know me, but you’re getting acquainted with me. I think you know now, you’ll have to kill me to get me to back down from truth, and I’m telling you today at Amherst, Don’t even think about it! (Applause.)

"THE MEDIA CAN'T BREAK ME"

For 10 years, I’ve been in this struggle. For 10 years, I have tried to sit down and dialogue with the Anti- Defamation League. For 10 years, I’ve asked them, “Let’s sit down and talk.” That’s the civilized thing to do. When people have a genuine disagreement, sit down and talk about it. They re- fuse. Rabbis come to my door, sit at my table, we have dinner, we talk candidly and frankly, we embrace each other. But the Rabbis have no power with these organizations that are politically inspired Zionist organizations. They don’t have any power. So even though we come to some agreement, the ADL has never agreed to sit down with me. Fine. I ain’t beggin’ you to sit down. I think it’s intelligent, because you don’t want it to go too far. You don’t want it to get that far, if you got sense. You thought that when the media attacked me, Farrakhan was going to dry up and blow away? Not this one. You can blow away them others, but not this one. Because the media didn’t make me, I’m not a creature of the media. So since the media didn’t create me, the media can’t break me. I guess you’ve learned that by now. The more you attack me, the bigger God makes me grow. (Applause)

And you haven’t learned your lesson yet, but I thank you, media — you really are wonderful. No, I’m serious — I’m not being facetious — they’re really wonderful. No, you really are; I respect you to the highest. Whatever you say to me is all right. You can cuss me out, line by line, word by word, and that’s what you do. But my teacher taught me, “Son, every knock is a boost.” So here we are now. Police all around — SWAT team, bomb squad, mounted police; Farrakhan gotta bring 100 security people. For what? For what? Because one Black man stood up to speak truth as he understood it and wouldn’t back down. And some of those in positions of power in the Jewish community feel that Black folks should back down, feel that we should bend and bow and scrape and scratch. You still bugged out over that Hamitic thing. Ham don’t have no relationship to me. (Applause.)

I am not one of the sons of Noah. I was before Noah. I was before Abraham. I was before Adam. Now, don’t give me no Johnny-come-lately as my father, because I know the history now. And if you scratch me—not scratch me—I mean push me, I’ll be glad to tell you not only where I’m from, but where you’re from too. (Applause.) [To be continued]

LOUIS FARRAKHAN will speak October 9, 2011 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania at the Philadelphia Convention Center. Tickets are $20. All races and religions are invited. Doors open at 12 p.m. Program starts at 2 pm. (www.noi.org) There will also be a presentation from 1 - 3 p.m. in Room 108 of the Convention Center by the Historical Research Group of the Nation of Islam, authors of the books The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, Volume 1 (on the slave trade) and volume 2 (on Judaic influence in the American South after the War Between the States).

***

Michael Hoffman is the founder of The Hoffman Center for the Study of Anti-Goyimism. On the Contrary is a public service of Independent History and Research, Box 849, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83816 USA. 

 

***

Read More

Talmudic circumcision rite exposed in graphic California comic book

Read an excerpt from the comic online here, along with an afterword by Michael Hoffman

A statement released on June 3 by the San Francisco office of the Anti-Defamation League called the comic "grotesque" as well as "disrespectful and deeply offensive.”

***

Read More

Israeli-First, Zionist Warhawk Glenn Beck Is No Martyr

Editor’s Note: Lately we have observed “anti-Zionist” and even supposed “anti-Talmud” right wingers blame “the Jews” for Glenn Beck’s derogation at Fox News. With blind guides like these Beck-sympathizers leading us, is it any wonder we’re losing the battle for hearts and minds? These alleged "anti-Talmudic Conservatives Christians" are beyond obtuse. When Nikita Krushchev sacked Lavrenty Beria, did it make Beria less of a Communist? Beck is no less a Zionist because Fox News has distanced itself from him. 

Because Beck’s apocalyptic mystification of history and politics is viewed as an increasingly buffoonish, demoagogic detraction from the sophisticated, professional public relations image the Zionist power structure wishes its talking heads to project, he has been moved off center stage. Big deal. We’re supposed to weep for our poor, persecuted populist oracle who has been viciously repressed by his masters.

Mr. Beck is a case-hardened Zionist, just like “Christian Conservative” Sarah Palin (who wore not a cross, but a hexagram [so-called “Star of David”] on her recent rear-end kissing tour of “Israel”). Beck is being transfered to the John Hagee circuit; in other words, to be used as the sideshow Israeli propagandist, not the main attraction. Rupert Murdoch and Roger Ailes believe that the mystic-Mormon Beck is not as professional in his demeanor and presentation as he should be. In response to this tactical move, right wingers have declared Beck to have been martyred by “the Jooze.” 

The right wing has a terminal disease: from Ronald Reagan to Glenn Beck, they worship their executioners. Even right wing supposed experts on Judaism have fallen for the false opposition mirage projected by the rabbinic, pillar of chesed/pillar of gevurah Temple of permissible Left/Right ideology, which has been imposed on the political framework of the West ever since the masonic French Revolution. Having suckered-in for this hallucination, right wing reverends proclaim Beck to be part of the noble opposition to the Temple! 

It’s five minutes to midnight on the clock of destiny and most of those who have appointed themselves as our guides and visionaries don’t have a clue. You want to weep? Weep for the hypnotic right wing herd that is simultaneously puffed up on its own imaginary grasp of the secret mind control methods of Judaism, while in actuality being just as dumbed-down as any other boob-tube bovine chewing its kosher cud.

— Michael Hoffman

Hoffman is the author of Judaism Discovered, an 1100 page textbook.

Hoffman’s writing and research are funded solely by donations from readers and the sale of his writings and recordings.

***

Israeli-First, Zionist Warhawk Glenn Beck Is No Martyr

Call Him An Israeli-First Zionist And A Dangerous Mossad Asset

But Please Don’t Call Glenn Beck A Martyr

By Hugh Akins

News of the firing of Fox superstar icon Glenn Beck is being received by unthinking Catholics, Christians and patriots as the greatest moral outrage since 9/11. “This poor persecuted patriot.” “So hated by the Jews.” “A genuine martyr for the cause of freedom.” “A real American hero.”

These are some of the things good people are actually saying about Zionist/Israeli-First Glenn Beck. Unable to spare the time to set the record straight and prove beyond all doubt that Mr. Beck is none of those things which good people think he is, but rather a total fraud, the next best thing is to share with you the following thoughts which were taken from my forthcoming book, Synagogue Rising. It was in that book that I had the audacity to suggest that Beck was one of the enemy’s “useful idiots” who, far from being a true conservative, is nothing more than a “Zionist Court Jester And Top Candidate For The Next ‘Most Dangerous Man In America’ Title.

I also predicted that Fox News would eventually fire him and that his Zionist handlers would make a martyr out of him, furthering their evil cause. The following is taken verbatim from my new book, Synagogue Rising. Enjoy the sneak preview.

The master manipulators once again get the dumbed-down American public to fall for yet another of their mass-deceptions as part of a meticulously engineered psychological warfare campaign against the simple-minded goyim.

The television addict who foolishly permits the likes of Glenn Beck to poison his/her thinking is certain to remain misinformed, confused and cemented in Rabbinic lies, even while believing they have all the answers and remedies for all the wrongs in the world. Such massive mind-conditioning is frightening.

Recently, part of our research for this book became part of a self-imposed penance for Lent. It turned out to be the most painful penance we could possibly inflict on our person. We subjected ourself to the exceedingly unpleasant task of sitting through a Glenn Beck TV presentation for the first – and we assure you – last time. More than “unpleasant,” the experience was downright revolting. Rarely, even after many long years on the front lines, have we encountered such a display of mindless babble, of intellectually drunken sophistry, of blatant deception, of emotion-charged propaganda, of outright treason disguised as patriotism. So deliriously insane is this comedian-propagandist of the Zionist right that we cannot help but agree with certain liberals that label him “Fox News’s paranoid superstar demagogue.” [1]

For all the talk about the New World Order, Glenn Beck is one of its most energetic and effective facilitators. How so? One reason: he is a fanatic warhawk for Israel. Nothing is driving the world faster into the Judaized New World Order than the aggressive and genocidal wars we are fighting for Israel.
The reason this Judaized court-jester is given so much coverage in the Jewish-controlled media – Fox is no less Zionist than all the other purveyors of disinformation – is because he is one of them, notwithstanding all the impassioned claims to the contrary.

 A Mormon by creed, Beck is therefore linked to Talmudic Freemasonry, which is and has always been under Judaic inspiration and control. With an estimated 2-3 million viewers per night, the “king of conservative porn” would not be in the national spotlight and raking in millions of dollars from blind conservatives from coast-to-coast if he were nearly as true-blue conservative and anti-Big Government as he makes himself out to be.

If there was anything we might agree on with the radically subversive hate-peddlers of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), it’s their concern regarding the upsurge in new “patriot” organizations in the past year. In its March 2, 2010 report, “Rage on the Right: The Year In Hate; Extremism,” we learn that “an astonishing 363 new patriot groups appeared in 2009, with the totals going from 149 groups (including 42 militias) the year before to 512 (127 of them militias) – a 244% jump.” [2]

Why should true patriots be alarmed over this development? Because the majority of these newly formed groups are part of the controlled opposition, intentional or otherwise. Like Fox News and Glenn Beck, their mission is to deceive, divert, discredit – in a word, neutralize – moral-minded citizens who would otherwise stand against the Rabbinic Tyranny that is right now fastening the final chains about the American people.

Conservative-minded middle America must wake up. Glenn Beck is more than just the leading conservative “court jester;” Glenn Beck, let us repeat and emphasize, is an unyielding Zionist. He is fond of saying that he’s not going to treat his audience like morons, but this is exactly what he does.

“Truth has no agenda,” he sanctimoniously grandstands. “Obama has an agenda…the left has an agenda… the media has an agenda…” He loves to rant and rage in self-righteous indignation, but certainly not him.

 He is the populist Moses-come-down-from-the-mountain-after-seeing-the-face-of-God to lead the "chosen people" of the right (Fox viewers) to the promised land of a restored America - Jeffersonian Constitutional Republicanism. His only agenda, he would have all his cheering and worshipful fans blindly believe, is to speak the truth, to expose evil, to save America from “Obammunism,” and to re-open the gates of heaven for all who tune in to Fox News and genuflect before him. It’s the gospel according to Glenn Beck. And, God save us, there are many conservative and traditional Catholics and other patriots who make up no small part of the Glenn Beck Fan Club.

Well, you can be sure that Mr. Beck and Fox TV have a far different agenda than what those who’ve become hypnotized by all their lies hold to be true. Their agenda is Israel’s agenda, it’s quite simple and quite obvious. And on the top of the list is the rabid push for war with Iran and more support for Israel and an ever escalating war on terror on Israel’s behalf.

 Make no mistake about it. This high-strung and pompous con-artist, comedian, showman, pseudo-conservative is no Moses, but no less a Mossad asset than Abe Foxman of the ADL is a Mossad agent, only less conspicuously so. And because the fact is more cleverly disguised, he is the more effective and hence the more dangerous traitor. At least Foxman is honest enough to openly stand for anti-Christian Talmudism. Beck is the greater deceiver whose task is to lead the whole of conservative/moderate-liberal middle America into the Zionist camp under the pretext of defending American and Israeli democracy and standing against Marxist and Islamic militancy.

Watch carefully – the process has already begun – as Tea Party conservatism is progressively assimilated into Ronald Reagan conservatism via the grand deception of Glenn Beck conservatism. Interestingly enough, it takes a liberal to see Beck for what he really is. Kevin Drum writes for the far-left Mother Jones consortium. Here’s what he says in part: “Glenn Beck is, for a liberal like me, far more entertaining to watch than, say, Sean Hannity or Bill O’Riley. The latter are garden variety blowhards and their subject matter is predictable. But Beck? He’s crazy! He thinks the Muslim Brotherhood is going to take over the entire Mediterranean! Fabian socialists are a fifth column working to subvert everything that makes America great! (But slowly, sneakily.) The Tides Foundation is on a mission to ‘warp your children’s brains’! And Obama the secret Marxist is behind it all! It all fits together!
“This is actually sort of entertaining in small doses. But in bigger doses, not so much.” [3]

The scam consists of a vast media effort, the left collaborating with the right as always, to project Glenn Beck as a persecuted enemy of the liberal establishment rather than an invaluable stooge of that same Talmudic establishment’s Grand Design for America and the world. Even the Jews, whom Beck serves with undying loyalty, criticize him in public in order to maintain the deception (as they now do with Obama). By portraying His Lordship Mr. Beck in this light, as an anti-Semite, he is lionized as a martyr/hero for “the cause” which is certain to galvanize more support for him and therefore secretly for International Jewry’s anti-Christian conspiracy. This is precisely what is happening.

 Michael Hoffman explains:

“Glenn Beck couldn’t be more of a slave of the Talmudic mentality if he wore a kippah (skullcap) and carried a copy of the Talmud Bavli onto the Fox News set. He follows their script 99% of the time. But it’s that one percent of independence that troubles any slave-master.

“(1) Beck is not supposed to use ‘Holocaust’ parallels. ‘Holocaust’ is a trademark of the Master Race of Holy People and they have a proprietary relationship with it. (2) Beck cannot criticize any certified ‘Holocaust’ saint. St. George Soros is one such Holy Person.

“For these two minor infractions the master chess players take the opportunity to be seen as highly critical of their shabbos goy, Mister Beck. He is portrayed as another ‘Father Coughlin,’ the peace campaigner and social justice worker who so annoyed the usual suspects in the 1930s. Beck is no Coughlin. The comparison is laughable. Beck [is PRO-war not antiwar as was Fr. Coughlin. Beck too] hates the social justice campaign against usury. His economic heroine is the greed-is-good Russian Khazar, Ayn Rand. But leave it to the Talmudic mentality to stretch the bounds of credulity with their delusion.

“Watch the pea under the shell: with this controversy, Zionists show themselves as independent of Beck and Beck gets to appear as a thorn in the side of Zionism – even though Beck is a fervent war-Zionist who doesn’t just kiss Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s feet, he kisses each of his toes…Watch for ‘useful idiots’ in the right wing start to refer to Beck as being ‘courageous as Father Coughlin’ and someone who is beginning to wake up about the ‘Jews.’” [4]

It’s also possible Beck will get “fired” by Fox to really dramatize the “persecuted martyr” false image. We recently saw the same tactic employed in the termination of Keith Olbermann from MSNBC, who is said to be Beck’s counterpart on the left. Right, left, centrist, Beck, Olbermann – they’re all on the same side: the side of their/our Talmudic Overlords, the Elders of Zion, Masters of America and the world.
An article titled “Glen Beck the Socialist” [5] does a poor job of exposing his Rabbinic, socialist, statist, Big Government proclivity, [6] no matter how much rhetoric is spent focusing on the opposite. But it does speak a single truth in observing that some folks “view him as a phony usurper of the freedom movement.” He is exactly, emphatically that.

In the months leading up to the 2008 presidential elections Beck was heard on nationwide television naming candidate McCain as his personal preference. Not Dr. Ron Paul, mind you; not Dr. Chuck Baldwin – either of whom would have been the proper choice if Beck really believed all the conservative verbiage that comes out of his mouth in an endless torrent of lies and deception. But Sen. John McCain, the least conservative, most radical candidate who has been described as “the most dangerous man in America” by Chronicles magazine? You can’t get any more socialist, statist, internationalist and Zionist than that without openly favoring Barack Obama or Hilary Clinton for president. And if we are not mistaken, he has named Sarah Palin as his prime choice in the up-coming 2012 elections. Yes, Sarah Palin, darling of the Zionist right.

For those who do not have their head buried in the sand, ostrich-like, Mr. Beck is as predictable as the rotation of dawn and dusk. Yet Beck’s rhetoric is always for less government intrusion in our lives, less federal regulations in the market, less state encroachments upon our liberties, less cultural and political communism, less Islamism...truly the man is a “saint,” is he not?

His defenders are quick to point out that he has invited on his show such genuine patriots as Dr. Ron Paul and G. Edward Griffin. This, we assert, is only to keep up the masquerade that he himself is a principled and leading conservative who can be trusted. But a closer look betrays a horse of an altogether different color.

He is certainly most cunning in the way he will manipulate such genuine conservatives on his program; most cunning in the way he, not his guests, will direct and dominate the dialogue, in the way he will allow certain truths to be disclosed only to totally dismiss them in drawing his typically false conclusions, in the way he will permit the discussion to go only so far before he will cut off his guests from speaking of the real issues, the real dangers, the real culprits.

 We read that in the same show which featured Mr. Griffin, expert on the Federal Reserve and author of the most comprehensive expose on the Fed ever produced, The Creature from Jekyll Island (Mr. Griffin who, by the way, hardly got a word in), Beck mocked the idea that a Rothschild conspiracy was behind the secret founding of America’s Central Bank, which is essentially a money monopoly of which Beck’s Fox sponsor is a key player, and that behind the Rothschild Empire was a vast International Crime Syndicate of Rabbinic anti-Christianism, all of which are matters of historical fact.

 Glenn Beck will attack George Soros, but never even whisper a word about the Cryptocracy’s far more powerful Insiders at B’nai B’rith, the ADL, Chabad Lubavitch, the OTO, in a word, those hardline anti-Christian Talmudists that sit at the pinnacle of Political and Financial Power over America and the world.
How is this systematic disinformation and cover-up of the facts not complete and utter treason on the part of media superstars like Glenn Beck? How is this not the charades of a shrewd and cunning master deceiver, and a Zionist wolf in sheep’s clothing?

This is the same Glenn Beck who practically single-handedly snatched hold of the initial Tea Party movement, which had some sincere patriots and noble intentions propelling it, and turned a huge part of it into just another false alternative to the bipartisan status quo Judeo-Masonic establishment. For all these reasons combined, and given the power he and Fox News seem to hold over the minds of countless millions of basically honest but absolutely conned patriotic Americans, Mr. Beck himself may well become the next “most dangerous man in America.” We cringe at the thought of how many traditional Catholics have been beguiled and played for a fool by this pied piper of crypto-Judaic Totalitarianism disguised as anti-Obama, Star-Spangled, Motherhood-and-Apple-Pie American Conservatism.

Dear friends, Glenn Beck’s mission, we cannot stress it enough, is to make true conservatives a laughing-stock, thereby undermining the moral and religious foundations upon which true conservatism is built. A Judaic “useful idiot” if ever there was one, Mr. Beck is to be considered extremely delusional in his self-adulation and exceedingly dangerous in the extent of his vast influence and mastery of disinformation.

We have much more to say about Sarah Palin, the Tea Party movement, the new up-coming Zionist “No Labels” third party controlled opposition to the two-party Zionist syndicate, neocons – false patriots and psychopathic warmongers, phony Christians who parrot the Zionist party line, etc. You’ll have to purchase a copy of Synagogue Rising to read the rest.

If you liked what you read above; if you see the importance of the book it was excerpted from, perhaps you will see fit to help us get this book published. It is 99.5% completed. Besides a few last-minute finishing touches, all we need now are the funds to take it to print. If you think this book has merit and is important, perhaps you will send us the most generous donation you can to help get it printed, bound, advertised and widely distributed. Getting this book into the hands of many good people is as much to your advantage as it is to ours. None of us are immune from the menace of crypto-Judaic Totalitarianism which is swiftly descending upon us all.

Thank you and God bless,

Hugh Akins, author

hughakins@comcast.net

www.CatholicActionResourceCenter.com

League of Christ the King, SSPX

CTC Books P.O. Box 678047, Orlando FL 32867

[1] David Corn of PoliticsDaily.com, quoted in “Beck’s Extremism: A Conservative Dilemma,” The Week, March 11, 2011.
[2] “Meet the Patriots – A ‘Patriot’ Movement Timeline,” SplCenter.org, April, 2010.
[3] Kevin Drum, “Standing Up To Glenn Beck,” MotherJones.com, Feb. 11, 2011.
[4] Michael Hoffman commenting on a message from Jewish Funds for Justice President Simon Greer, The Hoffman Wire, Hoffman@RevisionistHistory.org, Nov. 19, 2010.
[5] Phil Maymin, “Glenn Beck the Socialist,” LewRockwell.com, Sept. 16, 2010.
[6] How exactly is Glenn Beck a proponent of Big Government socialism? By answering a second question you will have your answer: “Does he or does he not crusade against such unconstitutional bureaucratic monstrosities as Department of Homeland Security (DHS), FEMA, the Fed, IRS, ATF, CIA, NSA, DEA, FDA, DoD, DoE, EPA…?” He will criticize the Fed, for example, but have you ever heard him saying it must be abolished? That it is a major instrument of Jewish oppression? The same for the Soviet-like DHS and all the other federal agencies that represent and foster totalitarian tyranny.

***

Read More